
A Lyga
Lithuania
28 Feb 25 - 22 Nov 25
Statistics of BTTS
A low number of BTTS outcomes in A Lyga signals well-drilled defenses and a tendency for teams to hold leads or grind out narrow victories without conceding.
Banga stands out for their low BTTS count of just , proving their success lies in limiting threats and playing a structured, defensive brand of football.
| Team | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Šiauliai | 21 | 36 | 58.33 | |||
| FK Trakai | 21 | 36 | 58.33 | |||
| FK Zalgiris Vilnius | 21 | 36 | 58.33 | |||
| Panevėžys | 20 | 35 | 57.14 | |||
| Dainava | 19 | 36 | 52.78 | |||
| Kauno Žalgiris | 18 | 36 | 50 | |||
| Suduva Marijampole | 18 | 36 | 50 | |||
| Hegelmann Litauen | 17 | 36 | 47.22 | |||
| Džiugas Telšiai | 16 | 36 | 44.44 | |||
| Banga | 11 | 35 | 31.43 |
Tips for using the League Statistics table
- Some leagues are divided into 'Apertura' and 'Clausura' or 'Regular Season' and 'Playoffs,' but we present the data globally.
- Currently, countries should be searched in English and leagues by their official local names.
- You can rearrange the table columns to suit your preferences.
Standings
A Lyga 2025
Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Form | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | 22 | 9 | 5 | 67 | 26 | +41 | D W L L W | 75 | |
| 2 | 36 | 21 | 4 | 11 | 56 | 43 | +13 | W L W W L | 67 | |
| 3 | 36 | 17 | 11 | 8 | 54 | 41 | +13 | L W W W D | 62 | |
| 4 | 36 | 15 | 14 | 7 | 48 | 36 | +12 | L D W W D | 59 | |
| 5 | 36 | 14 | 10 | 12 | 59 | 53 | +6 | D D L L L | 52 | |
| 6 | 36 | 14 | 7 | 15 | 56 | 49 | +7 | W L W L D | 49 | |
| 7 | 36 | 13 | 7 | 16 | 37 | 45 | -8 | D W L L D | 46 | |
| 8 | 36 | 11 | 9 | 16 | 38 | 36 | +2 | D W D W D | 42 | |
| 9 | 36 | 6 | 8 | 22 | 37 | 74 | -37 | D L D W W | 26 | |
| 10 | 36 | 3 | 9 | 24 | 27 | 76 | -49 | D L L L D | 18 |